Subscribe to Anthropic Science
Features on AI-assisted discoveries, practical workflows, and field notes across the sciences.
We’re launching a new blog about AI and science. We’ll share work happening at Anthropic and elsewhere, our collaborations with external researchers and labs, and discuss practical workflows for scientists using AI in their research.
Increasing the pace of scientific progress is a core part of Anthropic’s mission. Machines of Loving Grace describes the prospect of a “compressed 21st century” in which decades of scientific progress occur over just a few years. We’re starting to see what the early stages of that compression look like: AI is helping mathematicians to discover new proofs, individual researchers to run computational analyses that once required dedicated teams, and biologists to identify functional gene relationships across datasets of millions of cells.
Just as computers took on the task of computation, AI is now taking on parts of cognition. As a side effect of this shift, work that used to require years of specialized training can increasingly be done more quickly and cheaply with AI. The rate of progress raises sociological questions about the practice of science and the role of scientific institutions: What should research apprenticeship look like? How do we maintain trust in the literature when AI becomes more central to producing it? What does it even mean to be a scientist when the bottleneck shifts from execution to management?
Although the pace of improvement is rapid, some of these questions may feel premature today—AI’s scientific capabilities are, in many ways, still in beta. While models already seem superhuman at certain parts of the scientific workflow, they can also hallucinate results, be overly sycophantic, and get stuck on problems a domain practitioner would find trivial. Fields Medalist Timothy Gowers captured this tension well, writing that “it looks as though we have entered the brief but enjoyable era where our research is greatly sped up by AI but AI still needs us.”
AI will alter the scientific process in ways that are only starting to become apparent. This blog will discuss the upsides and challenges of the current moment for AI and science, exploring the excitement as it unfolds.
In this blog, we’ll share three main types of posts:
We’re publishing two pieces alongside this introduction: Matthew Schwartz’s “Vibe physics: The AI grad student,” a spotlight on supervising Claude through a real theoretical physics calculation, and a tutorial on orchestrating long-running tasks for scientific computation.
Anthropic has several initiatives aimed at accelerating scientific progress. Our AI for Science program provides API credits to researchers working on high-impact projects across biology, physics, chemistry, and other fields. Claude for Life Sciences is dedicated to making Claude useful for life sciences researchers and R&D teams, with partnerships across research institutions, pharma, and biotech. We recently shared some early results of these programs. And we’re a core partner in the Genesis Mission, a multi-billion-dollar initiative across industry, academia, and government to accelerate American science with AI.
Beyond these dedicated efforts, researchers across Anthropic are working to improve our models' core scientific capabilities and safely accelerate AI-assisted discovery. Many come from biophysics, chemistry, and neuroscience. We'll be reporting on their work and on efforts elsewhere in the field.
If you have something you want to see covered here, please reach out to us at scienceblog@anthropic.com.
Guest author Prof. Matthew Schwartz describes what happened when he stopped fighting Claude and allowed Claude to find “Claude-shaped” problems: ones best suited to the capabilities of the current generation of LLM tools. This led him to build BootLoops, a toolkit for exact calculations in quantitative science, which he has been applying across scientific fields alongside experts.
Read moreWe built an index of how well today’s robots can perform US job tasks. Robots can already do three-quarters of physical tasks, mostly in limited settings, but are cost-competitive for just 0.3% of them.
Read moreWe’re launching a new study using Anthropic Interviewer to learn from your experiences with AI, and we invite you to participate.
Read moreFeatures on AI-assisted discoveries, practical workflows, and field notes across the sciences.